Letting Your Cash Cow Go

The Painful Dilemma — To Let Go Or Not

Let History Be Your Guide

We don’t have answers to everything. More often than not, we got to make do with what we have and know. So if you did a comprehensive backtest, then that is the best starting point. And what is a comprehensive backtest? Besides realistic modeling, it should also cover a sufficiently long period comprising different market regimes. The reason is simple. We want to know how the strategy performs under different conditions. In particular, what are the risks, and what is the worst it has been through?

What Reference Can You Take From The Past?

1. Is the behavior of the strategy out of tune with similar periods in the past?

Holy grail strategies exist only in your dreams. There are only the right strategies at the right time. So all strategies will run into bad patches one day or another. A trend-following strategy suffers when the market swings sideways wildly. This occurs every now and then. Asset allocation strategies run into trouble when their correlations go to one and all head south together. Again, this is not new. It can happen when the market liquidity dries up under extreme pressure e.g. after the Lehman Brothers Collapse in 2008 and during the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Poor performance during periods unfavorable for your strategies are expected. As long it is within the norms, then it is not a cause for concern.

2. How deep are the losses compared against the past?

Now, it is one thing to expect losses during a bad patch. But that does not mean you should readily accept any level of loss. To gauge the level of acceptable loss, you can look at how much your strategy loses at its worst point in history. But since we are dealing with the future, it is always prudent to assume that you have yet to see the worst. So you might want to set a buffer over and on top of this worst loss. When that level is breached, it can be a signal to cut. Because you never know what can come next.

3. How long are the drawdown and recovery?

Another consideration is the inability of the strategy to recover from a drawdown. Of course, this might simply be a case of an exceptionally long bad patch rather than a fundamental breakdown. But in any case, we can never be sure and we can’t wait indefinitely. A slow bleed can be just as bad. Thus, after a certain point, it may make sense to drop it. Again, you can reference the longest drawdown in history to set the cut-off duration.

Conclusion

These are just some suggestions guided by quantitative measures. However, if you have a strong enough conviction that the strategy is still worth holding on, then there is nothing to stop you from doing so. Many long volatility funds underwent a period of slow bleed as volatility waned to record lows after quantitative easing since 2008. Their big break came after 2017 as markets went through a more turbulent period. But that said, they may still fall far short of recouping all their losses accumulated over the years.

--

--

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store